Teacher Preparation: Today’s Learning Environments

Note: This post examines the learning environments that relevant teacher preparation programs incorporate.

It’s not about the technology. For decades, educators have taken the position that it’s not the use of technology in and of itself that positively impacts student learning; the key is using technology effectively. I couldn’t agree more.

Yet, it’s also about the technology. In the blog post 21st Century Learning: It’s Not an Either/Or Argument, I outline that, while critical thinking and problem solving, communication, collaboration, and creativity are not new skills, what has changed is how teachers and students engage in these skills via digital tools. Therefore, it is imperative to prepare today’s teachers to navigate these new pathways for learning based on sound curriculum design, pedagogy, assessment practices, and learning management. To determine how teachers of 2030 are prepared, let us first review the various types of learning environments that exist today.

Face-to-Face (F2F): The traditional environment of a classroom teacher, with moderate or little to no technology. In technology-rich environments, iPads, tablets, and the use of educational apps is gaining traction, especially in elementary grades.

Flipped learning is changing how F2F time with students is being used. Although around for several years, the Flipped Learning Conference is in its fifth year, flipped learning is spreading rapidly today. While there is no one model of flipped learning, in a nutshell, teachers create or remix videos for students to view on their own, thus freeing class time for higher-order thinking activities and more customized, personalized instruction for students. Kahn Academy offers numerous videos. And, TED-Ed has stepped into the arena of flipped learning by offering educational videos, along with lessons and assessments that can be customized by a teacher. Further, TED-Ed provides a platform for teachers to share their work, empowering teachers to publish and share their work for a larger audience.

Note: Mobile Learning (see below) can be supported in F2F environments.

Connected Face-to-Face (CF2F): Classes meet each day in a traditional schedule but engagement is enhanced, augmented with digital tools, such as wikis, online discussions, polls, and other Web 2.0 tools, such as online graphic organizers and VoiceThread. While this model has been around for a number of years, it is not the norm. Today, the emergence of Learning Management Systems (LMS) in the cloud, such as Edmodo, Haiku, and others, increases CF2F experiences within a classroom, especially in light of an LMS’s capacity of keeping students protected and safe online within the school’s walled virtual garden. An LMS also supports flipped learning.

Another connected learning approach leveraging cloud and app capabilities uses mobile phones, often referred to as Bring Your Own Learning Device (BYOLD). In one model, schools establish policies for their use, turn off texting and voice features, and then issue mobile phones to students. Still in other models, students bring their own device, whether a mobile phone, tablet, or laptop.

The use of an LMS or BYOLD provides faster formative assessments via quick quizzes, polls, and discussions. If designed effectively, formative assessments provide snapshots of student understanding in meeting the learning objective, thus informing teachers of where to shift instruction so that all students achieve.

Hybrid (Blended): While there are numerous models of hybrid or blended learning, the basic description is that learning takes place F2F and online. Various digital Web 2.0 tools, LMS offerings, BYOLD, and Teen Second Life support hybrid environments.

Online: No F2F instruction takes place, with all instruction taking place online via an LMS and/or other digital tools. While around for a number of years, online learning is increasing, especially as both higher ed and K12 budgets are reduced.

Mobile Learning: In and Out of School

In F2F environments, the use of educational apps on tablets, iPads, or smartphones in K12 is growing. With a wide range of apps available across content areas, including GPS, cameras, mapping tools, and interactive ebooks, students can annotate, create, write, and edit writing and video on a mobile device. Moreover, mobile learning also takes place out of school, connected to the interests and passions of learners, challenging teachers and traditional assessment systems to rethink what learning is and how students “earn credits.”

Shifting Pedagogical Approaches

Teachers must no longer be the sage on the stage but the guide on the side This phrase, which has been with us for many, many years, is now amplified with technology use based on sound pedagogy. As teachers shift away from the lecture, teacher candidates must understand how to orchestrate non-traditional, student-centered learning. It is incumbent upon teacher educators and mentor teachers to guide teacher candidates in leveraging effective practices in various learning environments.

What other learning environments are there? Is your teacher preparation program relevant?

21st Century Learning: It’s Not an Either/Or Argument

There are those who believe that the list of 21st century skills bubbling up over that last dozen years – critical thinking and problem solving, communication, collaboration, and creativity and innovation – are not new. I would agree with that. However, what has changed is how teachers and students engage in these skills via digital tools. Moreover, I discount that if one uses digital tools in learning that traditional knowledge and skills – deep reading, scientific reasoning, and math – acquisition suffers.

Bottomline: It’s not an either/or argument.

21st Century Skills Are Not New – Yet, Some Things Have Changed: While 21st century skills are not new and have been at the core of sound pedagogy, even before industrial-style educational approaches, the use of digital tools has changed the landscape of learning and challenged teachers to be technologically literate. As Clay Shirky said, “When you change the way people communicate, you change culture.” And, that change in culture puts The Teacher in the midst of new learning which they must take on themselves and for students. This new learning does not set aside the necessity of students acquiring basic knowledge and skills but rather builds upon it in a dramatically different fashion than factory-model, Carnegie unit learning.

Critical Thinking: Learning while using digital tools does not ignore the importance of critical thinking. With teachers guiding students, which is not a new pedagogy, students can gain knowledge and learn to think critically by conducting effective Internet searches, ferreting out incorrect information, and verifying information before putting it to use in their own computer, the brain. True, good researching skills are needed with printed materials as well. However, learning to use selective keyword searches, Boolean searches, databases, and authoritative online texts is a relatively new skill. To think critically includes interpreting blog posts and comments, tagging, subscribing and annotating, within our personal space as well as our shared learning networks.

In order to think critically, a great deal of knowledge is necessary. However, how we gain the knowledge is what has shifted – titled the earth on its edge. What was once locked away in a library is now accessible in the palm of our hands and that fundamentally changes how and what enters our world – what gets our attention – as well as how we interpret and synthesize it, making thinking critically ever more important. Moreover, students who do not have the skills to navigate a digital world are at a disadvantage and may well become the next underclass.

Information via digital tools can be used to deepen our capacity to make observations and reach beyond our closed envelope by connecting and communicating with others beyond our immediate, face-to-face environment. To explore history from a different vantage point via gaming and sensory interaction. To see and manipulate the elegance and logic of science and math through interactive online activities. To understand the philosophical debates by not only studying them but engaging with others though digital learning networks. To mash-up ideas and create new ones.

Change that Learners of All Ages are Experiencing

Participatory Culture
: Yes, in the past (and today), we participated and collaborated in classrooms and neighborhoods – learning and playing. We’ll probably continue to do so to some degree. What has recently evolved is what Henry Jenkins coined the Participatory Culture, which calls for new media literacies – an outgrowth of a media-rich society. In his white paper, Confronting the Challenges of Participatory Culture: Media Education for the 21st Century, he calls for the needed skills in the new media culture which build upon the traditional skills taught in the classroom. Hence, new and emerging skills have been identified that are necessary for students to learn today for them to fully create and participate in their future.

Digital Citizenship: 
Yes, in the past (and today), we offered lessons in safety (don’t get in a car – or a buggy- with a stranger), public speaking, and civics. We’ll probably continue to do so to some degree. However, a new consideration has come about – digital citizenship, which includes new skills and considerations in preparing students for today and their future. We must share lessons with students that online communications are, as Shirky observed, “instant, global, and nearly permanent” and that one must cultivate digital footprints so he or she can be Googled well.

Collective Action: 
Yes, in the past, we have undertaken collective action in classrooms and neighborhoods – mock elections, food drives. We’ll probably continue to do so to some degree. Yet, something has changed. In Here Comes Everybody, Clay Shirky observed, “Gathering a group of people and getting them to act used to require significant resources, giving the world’s institutions a kind of monopoly on group effort. Now, though, the tools for sharing and co-operating on a global scale have been placed in the hands of individual citizens.”  Today, we, teachers, must share lessons with students that they have the power to topple corporations and governments sitting in the palm of their hand. We must share lessons with students that they are in the midst of an upheaval of “how things have always been done.” And, we must share these lessons with students as we are learning them ourselves.

As part of learning new lessons, teachers must continue to be critical thinkers, become scholars, ask the right questions, listen for what is not said, seek out connections, and retool and remix their skills.

I look forward to your comments.

Running the digital river of learning with you,

Emily Vickery

The Disaggregation of Education (Beyond Disruption)

We have just crossed – in the past few months – the cusp of The Disaggregation of Education. Even though evolving, the working definition of the disaggregation of education is, after disruption, the education market breaks into smaller pieces. And, the smaller pieces that meet a changing market demand will be the successful ones, impacting all education venues, including higher education. As part of this disaggregation of education, higher education as we  know it just died. While schools of higher education play a role in the immediate future in providing teacher preparation, that will change..

Currently, the change is evidenced by the following:

These are only a few of today’s observations; each day brings more.  It is the Disaggregation of Education, incubated from a merger of market demands and technology power – beyond online learning, beyond disruption – that is dismantling our current thinking and approaches to education, and it will be learning that triumphs, hopefully, in the end and not solely the quest for large profit margins. But, know that the Disaggregation of Education will have – and has already – a profound effect on every aspect of education, learning, and teaching.

What are your thoughts? What observations would you like to share on the disaggregation of education?

Running the digital river of learning with you,

Emily Vickery

The Future of Teacher Preparation & Social Entrepreneurs

This TechCrunch post Pathwright Launches Platform To Let Anyone Create, Sell Branded Online Courses is a must read.

Each course comes with a built-in social network for every student taking the course, allowing students to share notes, ask or answer discussion questions, and receive grades and feedback from teachers. Teachers can then publish their courses is a built-in, branded catalog and sell them directly, make them invitation-only, or offer monthly subscriptions that unlock all the courses. Educators can also offer online-only or location-based courses, or both, may be self-paced, or on a schedule with varying degrees of teacher interaction.

Now, what is described above is happening today. Thinking towards the future, perhaps teachers are prepared, not with courses, but with modules of experience embedded where learning happens – wherever that may be. Higher ed as we know it just ended; so, teacher preparation as we know it just ended as well.

In the future, teacher apprentices work with mentor teachers. Perhaps approach action research in conjunction with (or leading) “social entrepreneurs” by challenging them to solve a problem of Equity. Perhaps teacher mentors and teacher apprentices work with the future equivalent of today’s Stanford’s Innovations in Education course or those at Harvard Business School in Social Innovation Lab? (See Social Entrepreneurs Try to Offer Solutions to Problems in K-12) (Let’s don’t forget MIT’s Media Lab.) Instead of Race to the Top, perhaps it is Race for Equity?

Three examples of challenge sets (action research) put forth for these teacher apprentices and social entrepreneurs in the Race for Equity could be (1) close the Participation Gap (Pew Internet Report Digital Differences: Separate and Unequal in Digital Media); (2) reboot the public library system to continue the democratic ideal of free access to information and ideas by creating ebook or emedia repositories not tied to one format, such as Apple or Amazon, and checking out ereaders and mini-WIFI connectivity (See ZDNET series on the Digital Underclass); and (3) link economic development with education and wrap-around services in rural areas, including reservations for Indigenous populations and under served urban and suburban areas, e.g. lighting up dark fiber, National Broadband Plan, and the Summit on the Role of Education in Economic Development in Rural America, at which Education Secretary Duncan recently spoke. Further, numerous applications for special needs through universal access could be thought of, especially with the rise of Autism.

It is important to note that standards (Common Core or others in the future) not be used. Why? It’s important that standards not be used if going to scale and designing relevant, engaging curriculum (HOTS), global reach/partnerships, and application of Equity solutions on a worldwide market that are “made in America” AND can be replicated elsewhere. (See EdWeek commentary Does the Common Core Matter?) A universal language in learning products can be used. Digital Bloom Verbs provide a solution in content/product development and distribution would be the solution. Products could be tweaked considering the availability of infrastructure and mobility, e.g. low-tech, high-tech, bandwidth, etc. Ultimately, benefiting all children.

Thoughts?

Teacher Collaboration: The Missing Link in School Reform

The Missing Link in School Reform is a must read. Using research, Carrie R. Leana identifies the predominant ideology (human capital) in public school reform (Power of the Individual; Wisdom of the Outsider; Principal as Instructional Leader) and outlines the reality (social capital) of how sustained, successful reform (The Power of the Collective; Reform from Within; and Principal as Protector) can be designed.

She writes:

These three beliefs—in the power of teacher human capital, the value of outsiders, and the centrality of the principal in instructional practice—form the implicit or explicit core of many reform efforts today. Unfortunately, all three beliefs are rooted more in conventional wisdom and political sloganeering than in strong empirical research. Together they constitute what I call the ideology of school reform. And although this, like all ideology, may bring us comfort in the face of uncertainty and failure, it is unhelpful and perhaps dangerous if it leads us to pursue policies that will not bring about sustained success. Our research suggests that there is some truth to the predominant ideology. Teacher competence does affect student learning. Outsiders can bring fresh ideas and enthusiasm to tired systems. And principals do have a role in reform efforts. At the same time, our findings strongly suggest that in trying to improve public schools we are overselling the role of human capital and innovation from the top, while greatly undervaluing the benefits of social capital and stability at the bottom.


Her findings will not surprise teachers, who are very often marginalized from school reform policy development and understand the power of collaboration. However, the results may cause those who hold the predominant ideology to become defensive and dismissive.

What are your thoughts? Do the research results surprise you? Would you add another item to the list of successful school reform based on social capital?

Running the digital river of learning with you,

Emily Vickery

Remixing Teacher Preparation

Over at Learning Matters regarding teacher quality and training, Barnett Berry wrote, “Jettison traditional three-hour course credits in favor of performance-based pedagogical modules and assessments: This nimble, practical approach will help recruits to develop specific teaching skills and will better identify who is ready to teach, when, and under what conditions.”

I couldn’t agree with him more. For quite some time, I’ve been an advocate for remixing teacher preparation. How can teacher preparation be remixed? To answer that question, I began asking the following questions:

(1) Can post-secondary institutions truly support what today’s teachers need to be successful, especially if they are looking at an implosion of the very institutions attempting to prepare teachers? Can an institutional model be successful when a blended, network model is supplanting traditional organizational structures? Should we not explore ideas, such as the one Howard Rheingold, in his post Democratizing Learning Innovation, examines of how “learning can be liberated from its industrial, factory-model roots”?

(2) Should teacher preparation be undertaken in three-hour, silo courses, which are isolated from the realities of a teacher’s experience? Or, should teacher preparation be designed considering badges, as defined by Digital Media and Learning, and learning and performance assessment undertaken by mentors, teacher leaders, and teacherpreneurs?

(3) Would it be a better idea to remix teacher preparation by embedding the experience in real learning communities, including face-to-face, blended, and cyber learning environments? (The idea isn’t necessary new, but does it require a fresh perspective?) Would a multi-disciplinary approach be a better design to prepare teachers, such as has been done at the Yale School of Management in its Organizational Perspectives, which was created under the direction of the then dean now turned director of Apple University Joel Podolny?  Perhaps close scrutiny of the Organizational Perspectives experience will prompt a remixing of teacher preparation? (And, don’t overlook downloading the PDF of the Integrated MBA Curriculum Diagram.)

(4) How can teacher preparation programs ready teachers for new and emerging roles as teacherpreneurs, such as Web Curator, Learning Architect, Network Sherpa, and Community Connector?

What are your questions? What are your ideas? What directions intrigue you? How would you remix teacher preparation?

I look forward to your thoughts.

Running the digital river of learning with you,
Emily Vickery